McQuary v. State
288 S.W.3d 831, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1127, 2009 WL 2382370
Opinion
ORDER
Larue McQuary appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Mr. McQuary claims that the trial court clearly erred in denying his motion because he did not receive a fair trial due to a juror’s intentional nondisclosures during voir dire. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McQuary v. State, 288 S.W.3d 831, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1127, 2009 WL 2382370 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
288 S.W.3d 831 (McQuary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. ROZZELLE
288 S.W.3d 831 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)