McQuary v. Cass

Indiana Supreme Court

McQuary v. Cass

16 Ind. 306, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 147

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 6, 1861

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Ind. 306 (McQuary v. Cass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McQuary v. Cass, 16 Ind. 306, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 147 (Ind. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

Aaron Gass, guardian of Martha J. and Joseph Baldwin, sued Gaily Me Quary and James Me Quary, on a promissory note for the payment of $270 -¶?. The record shows that process was duly served on the defendants, but they failed to appear, were regularly defaulted, and judgment by default accordingly rendered against them. It does not, however, appear that they moved the Court below to set aside the default. It follows, this appeal can not be sustained. 9 Ind. 236; 13 id. 430; id. 453.

The judgment is affirmed, with 3 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Ouriam.

Aaron Gass, guardian of Martha J. and Joseph Baldwin, sued Gaily Me Quary and James Me Quary, on a promissory note for the payment of $270 -¶?. The record shows that process was duly served on the defendants, but they failed to appear, were regularly defaulted, and judgment by default accordingly rendered against them. It does not, however, appear that they moved the Court below to set aside the default. It follows, this appeal can not be sustained. 9 Ind. 236; 13 id. 430; id. 453.

The judgment is affirmed, with 3 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ind. 306, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcquary-v-cass-ind-1861.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack