McQuain v. Glougie

224 P. 1066, 38 Idaho 715, 1924 Ida. LEXIS 162
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 29, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 224 P. 1066 (McQuain v. Glougie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McQuain v. Glougie, 224 P. 1066, 38 Idaho 715, 1924 Ida. LEXIS 162 (Idaho 1924).

Opinion

BUDGE, J.

— This action was brought to recover a balance due on contract. To the complaint an answer was filed and upon the issues thus made the cause was tried to the court and a jury. A verdict was rendered in favor of respondent and judgment was thereupon entered. A motion for [716]*716new trial was made by appellant which was overruled. From the judgment and from the order overruling the motion for a new trial this appeal is taken.

When the cause was reached for argument in this court, neither party appeared and no briefs were filed. Upon this state of the record, and in accordance with Rule 48 of this court, the record has been examined to ascertain whether it is sufficient to support the judgment as entered. (Hecker v. Johnson, 36 Ida. 417, 211 Pac. 445; Ellsworth v. Hill, 34 Ida. 359, 200 Pac. 1067; Hoffman v. Payette Heights Irr. Dist., 35 Ida. 375, 205 Pac. 515.)

The record does not disclose any fundamental errors in the court below. The judgment is therefore affirmed with costs to respondent.

McCarthy, C. J., and William A. Lee and Wm. E. Lee, J"J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrison v. Finch
237 P. 422 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 P. 1066, 38 Idaho 715, 1924 Ida. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcquain-v-glougie-idaho-1924.