McQuaid v. W. T. Grant Co.

9 A.2d 733, 336 Pa. 475, 1939 Pa. LEXIS 543
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 30, 1939
DocketAppeal, 236
StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.2d 733 (McQuaid v. W. T. Grant Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McQuaid v. W. T. Grant Co., 9 A.2d 733, 336 Pa. 475, 1939 Pa. LEXIS 543 (Pa. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This was an action for false imprisonment. It was tided under the principles laid down in McCarthy v. De Arndt, 99 Pa. 63, at 71, and as the court below said, both sides were fairly presented to the jury, which found for appellee, and there is no error in the record upon which this Court could base a reversal. Where the evidence is conflicting, a directed verdict cannot be ordered, as suggested by appellant. This was the principal question presented. Nor did the court below err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCarthy v. De Armit
99 Pa. 63 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.2d 733, 336 Pa. 475, 1939 Pa. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcquaid-v-w-t-grant-co-pa-1939.