McQuaid v. Sturgeon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

McQuaid v. Sturgeon

106 A. 303, 263 Pa. 187, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 394

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 4, 1919

DocketAppeal, No. 46

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 A. 303 (McQuaid v. Sturgeon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McQuaid v. Sturgeon, 106 A. 303, 263 Pa. 187, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 394 (Pa. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The learned chancellor below found that early in January, 1913, J. C. McQuaid, one of the plaintiffs in the cross-bill, and W. H. Sturgeon and J. H. Watt, defendants in it, formed a partnership, and that the same had never been legally dissolved. We have not been convinced that this is an erroneous finding and the decree based upon it is, therefore, affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The learned chancellor below found that early in January, 1913, J. C. McQuaid, one of the plaintiffs in the cross-bill, and W. H. Sturgeon and J. H. Watt, defendants in it, formed a partnership, and that the same had never been legally dissolved. We have not been convinced that this is an erroneous finding and the decree based upon it is, therefore, affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A. 303, 263 Pa. 187, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcquaid-v-sturgeon-pa-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack