McQuaid v. Sturgeon

106 A. 303, 263 Pa. 187, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 394
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 4, 1919·No. Appeal, No. 46·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The learned chancellor below found that early in January, 1913, J. C. McQuaid, one of the plaintiffs in the cross-bill, and W. H. Sturgeon and J. H. Watt, defendants in it, formed a partnership, and that the same had never been legally dissolved. We have not been convinced that this is an erroneous finding and the decree based upon it is, therefore, affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McQuaid v. Sturgeon, 106 A. 303, 263 Pa. 187, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 394 (Pa. 1919).

106 A. 303 (McQuaid v. Sturgeon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McQuaid v. Sturgeon
77 Pa. Super. 441 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)