McPike v. Pew

48 Mo. 525
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1871·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Currier, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff instituted these proceedings to enjoin the collection of a special lax levied by the County Court of Pike county. They aver in their petition that the levy was “ wholly unauthorized and void.” This averment states the case out of court, for if the levy was void, it clothed no one with even a color of right to enforce the collection of the tax. An officer seizing property under such void tax levy would be a mere trespasser, and the injured party would have an ample remedy at law. The remedy by injunction is not applicable to the facts stated in the petition. (Sayre v. Tompkins, 28 Mo. 443 ; Barrow v. Davis, 46 Mo. 394 ; Hopkins v. Lovell, 47 Mo. 102.)

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McPike v. Pew, 48 Mo. 525 (Mo. 1871).

48 Mo. 525 (McPike v. Pew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacobs v. Cauthorn
238 S.W. 443 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1922)
Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Donahoe
8 Del. Ch. 422 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1899)
Williams v. County Court of Grant Co.
26 W. Va. 488 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1885)
Second Nat. Bank of Titusville v. Caldwell
13 F. 429 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1882)