McPike v. Pew

48 Mo. 525
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 48 Mo. 525 (McPike v. Pew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McPike v. Pew, 48 Mo. 525 (Mo. 1871).

Opinion

Currier, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff instituted these proceedings to enjoin the collection of a special lax levied by the County Court of Pike county. They aver in their petition that the levy was “ wholly unauthorized and void.” This averment states the case out of court, for if the levy was void, it clothed no one with even a color of right to enforce the collection of the tax. An officer seizing property under such void tax levy would be a mere trespasser, and the injured party would have an ample remedy at law. The remedy by injunction is not applicable to the facts stated in the petition. (Sayre v. Tompkins, 28 Mo. 443 ; Barrow v. Davis, 46 Mo. 394 ; Hopkins v. Lovell, 47 Mo. 102.)

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacobs v. Cauthorn
238 S.W. 443 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1922)
Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Donahoe
45 A. 583 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1899)
Williams v. County Court of Grant Co.
26 W. Va. 488 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1885)
Second Nat. Bank of Titusville v. Caldwell
13 F. 429 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Mo. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpike-v-pew-mo-1871.