McPherson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McPherson v. State

619 So. 2d 522, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6704, 1993 WL 215592

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McPherson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6504 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 1993·No. No. 92-1105·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises a number of issues on appeal, only one of which has merit and needs to be addressed. The trial court erred in imposing consecutive minimum [523]*523mandatory sentences for offenses arising out of a single criminal episode. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). The convictions are affirmed, but the sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing.

SMITH, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises a number of issues on appeal, only one of which has merit and needs to be addressed. The trial court erred in imposing consecutive minimum [523]*523mandatory sentences for offenses arising out of a single criminal episode. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). The convictions are affirmed, but the sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing.

SMITH, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

McPherson v. State, 619 So. 2d 522, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6704, 1993 WL 215592 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

619 So. 2d 522 (McPherson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related