McPherson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McPherson v. State

619 So. 2d 522, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6704, 1993 WL 215592

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1105

StatusPublished

This text of 619 So. 2d 522 (McPherson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McPherson v. State, 619 So. 2d 522, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6704, 1993 WL 215592 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises a number of issues on appeal, only one of which has merit and needs to be addressed. The trial court erred in imposing consecutive minimum [523]*523mandatory sentences for offenses arising out of a single criminal episode. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). The convictions are affirmed, but the sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing.

SMITH, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises a number of issues on appeal, only one of which has merit and needs to be addressed. The trial court erred in imposing consecutive minimum [523]*523mandatory sentences for offenses arising out of a single criminal episode. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). The convictions are affirmed, but the sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing.

SMITH, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 So. 2d 522, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6704, 1993 WL 215592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpherson-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack