McPherson v. Norfleet

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6608

STANFORD EL CHRISTOPHER MCPHERSON, JR., a/k/a Chris Rattis,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOI CRYSTAL NORFLEET; ERROL DAWSON JARMAN, Agent, “S.B.I”; SCOTT DAVID SIKKINK, Det.; TABITHA ANN ADKINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:04-ct-00713-H)

Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 30, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., appeals the

district court’s order denying his attempt to file motions in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint that had been dismissed in 2004.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. McPherson v. Norfleet, No. 5:04-ct-00713-H (E.D.N.C. filed

Mar. 28, 2006 & entered Mar. 29, 2006). We deny McPherson’s motion

for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -