McPherson v. Mozingo
This text of McPherson v. Mozingo (McPherson v. Mozingo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6444
STANFORD EL CHRISTOPHER MCPHERSON, JR., a/k/a Chris Rattis,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BUDDY MOZINGO; ERROL DAWSON JARMAN; SCOTT DAVID SIKKINK; DALE AUTRY; TABITHA ANN ADKINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03090-D)
Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: June 2, 2008
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., appeals the
district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed
the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
We deny McPherson’s motion to amend his complaint and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McPherson v. Mozingo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpherson-v-mozingo-ca4-2008.