McPherson v. McPherson

796 So. 2d 1230, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14633, 2001 WL 1205837
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-1688
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 796 So. 2d 1230 (McPherson v. McPherson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McPherson v. McPherson, 796 So. 2d 1230, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14633, 2001 WL 1205837 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case involves a seven and a half year marriage between a sixty-seven year old husband and a sixty-five year old wife. The marriage was the second for the husband and the fifth for the wife. We affirm the trial court’s well crafted final judgment in all respects but one — we remand to correct a mathematical error in the cash equalization payment ordered by the court as part of the equitable distribution scheme. The payment should have been $96,379 rather than $93,379. See Banton v. Parker-Banton, 756 So.2d 155, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (remanding, in part, to correct mathematical error).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matajek v. Skowronska
927 So. 2d 981 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
796 So. 2d 1230, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14633, 2001 WL 1205837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpherson-v-mcpherson-fladistctapp-2001.