McPherson v. McPherson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McPherson v. McPherson

796 So. 2d 1230, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14633, 2001 WL 1205837

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 2001·No. No. 4D00-1688·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case involves a seven and a half year marriage between a sixty-seven year old husband and a sixty-five year old wife. The marriage was the second for the husband and the fifth for the wife. We affirm the trial court’s well crafted final judgment in all respects but one — we remand to correct a mathematical error in the cash equalization payment ordered by the court as part of the equitable distribution scheme. The payment should have been $96,379 rather than $93,379. See Banton v. Parker-Banton, 756 So.2d 155, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (remanding, in part, to correct mathematical error).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case involves a seven and a half year marriage between a sixty-seven year old husband and a sixty-five year old wife. The marriage was the second for the husband and the fifth for the wife. We affirm the trial court’s well crafted final judgment in all respects but one — we remand to correct a mathematical error in the cash equalization payment ordered by the court as part of the equitable distribution scheme. The payment should have been $96,379 rather than $93,379. See Banton v. Parker-Banton, 756 So.2d 155, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (remanding, in part, to correct mathematical error).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

McPherson v. McPherson, 796 So. 2d 1230, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14633, 2001 WL 1205837 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

796 So. 2d 1230 (McPherson v. McPherson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related