McPherson v. Lee
This text of 101 A.D.3d 1330 (McPherson v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1331]*1331Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the matter was properly transferred to this Court, as the petition raises a question of substantial evidence (see CPLR 7804 [g]). Moreover, the detailed misbehavior report and related documentation, together with the testimony of the correction officers involved in the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination (see Matter of Hemphill v Fischer, 94 AD3d 1309, 1309 [2012]; Matter of Terrence v Fischer, 64 AD3d 1110, 1111 [2009]). Petitioner’s claim of retaliation presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Martin v Fischer, 98 AD3d 774, 774 [2012]; Matter of Wright v Fischer, 98 AD3d 759, 759 [2012]). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the determination of guilt.
Rose, J.P., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A.D.3d 1330, 956 N.Y.2d 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpherson-v-lee-nyappdiv-2012.