McPherson v. East

670 So. 2d 1196, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3466, 1996 WL 154473
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 1996
DocketNo. 95-955
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 670 So. 2d 1196 (McPherson v. East) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McPherson v. East, 670 So. 2d 1196, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3466, 1996 WL 154473 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We vacate the order of change of custody and remand for rehearing for the reason that we cannot determine that the best interests of the child were considered by the trial court. § 61.13(3), Fla.Stat. (1995); Andrews v. Andrews, 624 So.2d 391 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

PETERSON, C.J., and W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Engram v. Bryan
779 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 So. 2d 1196, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3466, 1996 WL 154473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpherson-v-east-fladistctapp-1996.