Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McPherson v. East

McPherson v. East

670 So. 2d 1196, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3466, 1996 WL 154473
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 1996·No. No. 95-955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We vacate the order of change of custody and remand for rehearing for the reason that we cannot determine that the best interests of the child were considered by the trial court. § 61.13(3), Fla.Stat. (1995); Andrews v. Andrews, 624 So.2d 391 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

PETERSON, C.J., and W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McPherson v. East, 670 So. 2d 1196, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3466, 1996 WL 154473 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

670 So. 2d 1196 (McPherson v. East) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Engram v. Bryan
779 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)