McPherson v. City of Fayetteville Police Department

447 F. App'x 436
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2011·No. No. 10-7192·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dis[437]*437missing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny McPherson’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McPherson v. City of Fayetteville Police Dep’t, No. 5:09-ct-03145-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McPherson v. City of Fayetteville Police Department, 447 F. App'x 436 (4th Cir. 2011).

447 F. App'x 436 (McPherson v. City of Fayetteville Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related