McPherson Bros. v. Okanogan-Douglas Inter-County Bridge Co.

Supreme Court

McPherson Bros. v. Okanogan-Douglas Inter-County Bridge Co.

278 U.S. 571, 49 S. Ct. 93

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 3, 1928

DocketNo. 439

StatusPublished

This text of 278 U.S. 571 (McPherson Bros. v. Okanogan-Douglas Inter-County Bridge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McPherson Bros. v. Okanogan-Douglas Inter-County Bridge Co., 278 U.S. 571, 49 S. Ct. 93 (1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the writ of error as an application for certiorari the same is denied for want, of 'a substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the writ of error as an application for certiorari the same is denied for want, of 'a substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 U.S. 571, 49 S. Ct. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpherson-bros-v-okanogan-douglas-inter-county-bridge-co-scotus-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack