McPheeters v. United Services Automobile Association

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio
DecidedJanuary 14, 2021
Docket1:20-cv-00414
StatusUnknown

This text of McPheeters v. United Services Automobile Association (McPheeters v. United Services Automobile Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McPheeters v. United Services Automobile Association, (S.D. Ohio 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

ROBERTA A. MCPHEETERS, CASE NO.: 1:20-CV-00414-TSB individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., JUDGE TIMOTHY S. BLACK Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Defendants. CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court by stipulation of Plaintiffs, Roberta McPheeters, Latondra Taylor, and Bernard Ivory and Defendants, United Services Automobile Association, USAA Casualty Insurance Company, and Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company (collectively the “Parties”); and the Court, having reviewed the stipulation and being fully advised in the premises, hereby enters the following Confidentiality and Protective Order (“Order”): 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action may involve production of items and materials alleged to be trade secrets, confidential and proprietary business information, and other private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 11.3, that this Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal without compliance with Local Rule 5.2.1. 2. DEFINITIONS a) CONFIDENTIAL information or items: Information (regardless of how it is

generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). b) Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in pre-trial or pre-hearing disclosures, in response to a court order, or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. c) Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, but not limited to, testimony, transcripts, documents, answers to interrogatories, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in pre- trial or pre-hearing disclosures, in response to a court order, or in responses to discovery in this

matter. d) Expert or consultant: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. “Expert” shall specifically include electronic discovery vendors. e) HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY: Extremely sensitive “Confidential information or items,” disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. f) Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. g) Counsel of Record: attorneys who are retained to represent or advise a Party, and/or have entered an appearance in this action on behalf of that Party, and all employees of a law firm

which has entered an appearance on behalf of a Party. h) Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, corporate representatives, consultants, and Counsel of Record. i) Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Discovery Material in this action. j) Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. k) Protected Material: any Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

l) Receiving Party: a Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, transcripts, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their counsel that reveal Protected Material. Without the express written consent of the Producing Party, confidential documents produced and testimony elicited in connection with this lawsuit shall not be used by the Receiving Party for any purposes other than as reasonably necessary and appropriate for preparing for and participating in this lawsuit. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this

Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order shall take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate

standards. To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party shall designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify for such protection. If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, such Designating Party shall promptly, upon learning of a mistaken designation, notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order shall be clearly designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: a) For information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing

Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” to each page that contains Protected Material. b) For testimony given in deposition or in other pre-trial or trial proceedings, the Designating Party shall identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, that some or all of the testimony is protected and specify the level of protection being asserted. However, whether designated as such at the deposition or not, a Designating Party may specify up to 10 days after receipt of the final transcript from the court reporter, the specific testimony (by page range(s)) or that the entire transcript shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Parties shall give all other Parties and Designating Parties reasonable notice if they

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McPheeters v. United Services Automobile Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpheeters-v-united-services-automobile-association-ohsd-2021.