McPheeters v. Tolbert
This text of 561 So. 2d 18 (McPheeters v. Tolbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rodger Franklin McPHEETERS, Appellant,
v.
Dorothy Christina TOLBERT, Etc., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*19 E.G. Musleh, Ocala, for appellant.
Mary Catherine Landt of Forman, Krehl & Landt, Ocala, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's denial of the Motion for Relief from Judgment and Motion for Rehearing is affirmed in circuit court case number 88-2309-CA-A.
The appeal of the order dismissing appellant's complaint with prejudice in circuit court case number 88-3729-CA-B is dismissed since this court lacks jurisdiction. An order granting a motion to dismiss "with prejudice" is an order granting a motion, not an order dismissing an action, and it is not appealable. Johnson v. First City Bank of Gainesville, 491 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). This court has adopted a strict policy of dismissal of non-final orders. Arcangeli v. Albertson's, Inc., 550 So.2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
COBB, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
561 So. 2d 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpheeters-v-tolbert-fladistctapp-1990.