McPhee v. State

728 So. 2d 332, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2557, 1999 WL 123722
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 10, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2134
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 728 So. 2d 332 (McPhee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McPhee v. State, 728 So. 2d 332, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2557, 1999 WL 123722 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order summarily denying defendant’s motion for posteonviction relief as to grounds two (c) and three of defendant’s motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing. The record before this Court does not conclusively refute defendant’s allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel as to his attorney’s misadvice concerning the potential consequence of testifying and failure to call an alibi witness. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d); Wilcox v. State, 622 So.2d 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). We affirm the denial of posteonviction relief on the remaining issues.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brooks v. State
755 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
728 So. 2d 332, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2557, 1999 WL 123722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcphee-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.