McPhee v. Coombe

680 N.E.2d 614, 89 N.Y.2d 1026, 658 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 498
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 1, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 680 N.E.2d 614 (McPhee v. Coombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McPhee v. Coombe, 680 N.E.2d 614, 89 N.Y.2d 1026, 658 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 498 (N.Y. 1997).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to establish timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).

Judge Wesley taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
680 N.E.2d 614, 89 N.Y.2d 1026, 658 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcphee-v-coombe-ny-1997.