McPhearson v. State

997 So. 2d 1207, 2008 WL 5352002
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 24, 2008·No. 3D07-2710·Published

Opinion

997 So.2d 1207 (2008)

Alvin McPHEARSON, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D07-2710.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 24, 2008.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Lunar Claire Alvey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

WELLS, J.

Affirmed. See J.L.W. v. State, 814 So.2d 1223, 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (finding that charging the defendant with burglary of a structure, as opposed to burglary of a *1208 conveyance, was not reversible error because "[t]here was `not such variance [between the charge and the proof] here as could have misled respondent or subjected him to reprosecution,'" (quoting Dozier v. State, 662 So.2d 382, 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), reversed on other grounds, 675 So.2d 110 (Fla.1996))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McPhearson v. State, 997 So. 2d 1207, 2008 WL 5352002 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

997 So. 2d 1207 (McPhearson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dozier v. State
662 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
State v. Dozier
675 So. 2d 110 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
J.L.W. v. State
814 So. 2d 1223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)