McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Services, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Services, Inc.

575 F. App'x 181

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 13, 2014·No. No. 14-1057·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Douglas E. McPhail appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing the federal claims in his civil action for failure to state a claim, declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state claims and remanding them to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm [182] for the reasons stated by the district court. McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Sens., Inc., No. 5:13-cv-00645-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 2013). We dispense with' oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Douglas E. McPhail appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing the federal claims in his civil action for failure to state a claim, declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state claims and remanding them to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm [182] for the reasons stated by the district court. McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Sens., Inc., No. 5:13-cv-00645-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 2013). We dispense with' oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Services, Inc., 575 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

575 F. App'x 181 (McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.