McPhail v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

McPhail v. Oregon State Penitentiary

773 P.2d 828, 96 Or. App. 753

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 24, 1989

Docket11-87-169, 11-87-166-A; CA A47028

StatusPublished

This text of 773 P.2d 828 (McPhail v. Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McPhail v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 773 P.2d 828, 96 Or. App. 753 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated a disciplinary rule and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine.¹ He first contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. We disagree. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the fine is invalid. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated a disciplinary rule and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine.¹ He first contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. We disagree. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the fine is invalid. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

773 P.2d 828, 96 Or. App. 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcphail-v-oregon-state-penitentiary-orctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack