McPhail v. Oregon State Penitentiary
773 P.2d 828, 96 Or. App. 753
Opinion
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated a disciplinary rule and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine.1 He first contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. We disagree. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the fine is invalid. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).
Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McPhail v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 773 P.2d 828, 96 Or. App. 753 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).
773 P.2d 828 (McPhail v. Oregon State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watson v. Oregon State Penitentiary
750 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)