M'Coun v. Sheriff of Fayette
This text of 8 Ky. 362 (M'Coun v. Sheriff of Fayette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This writ of error is brought to recover a judgment rendered against M’Coun, upon a summons issued from the clerk’s office of Fayette, for M’Coun to answer and say ■whether he was indebted to Daniel Gibbs, an insolvent debtor, $340.
The summons having been executed, and M’Coun fail* ⅛ *° appear, after a continuance of one term, judgment was rendered against him by default, for the amount sped-fied in the summons.
The proceedings having been had under the act of this country concerning executions, (1 Littell, 549,) the clerk, no doubt, correctly issued the summons against M’Coun, w*t'30ut l^,,e'n requiring him to answer the complaint of anJ particular creditor.
And as the act no where requires a declaration to be file[^ j|ie C0Urt most clearly, upon the failure of M’Coun to aPP®ar and answer, correctly entered judgment against him for the amount contained in the summons. 1
And although, as the act directs, judgment was entered favor of the sheriff, yet as the sheriff is nowise person* ally interested in the claim against M’Coun, the gummo# was properly directed to, and served by him.
The judgment must be affirmed with cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ky. 362, 1 A.K. Marsh. 362, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcoun-v-sheriff-of-fayette-kyctapp-1818.