M'Connell v. Read

8 Tenn. 224
Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1827·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

To show a variance, between the note or obligation declared on, and the one said to be produced, oyer should have been craved, the instrument set out, and thereby made a part of the record. The court will not notice the clerk’s recital of an obligation, not made a part of the record by the pleadings. The justice of the case is attained, therefore affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M'Connell v. Read, 8 Tenn. 224 (Tenn. 1827).

8 Tenn. 224 (M'Connell v. Read) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.