Home/Ninth Circuit/McO v. II)

McO v. II)

829 F.2d 40, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12392
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 10, 1987·No. 85-2802·Published

Opinion

829 F.2d 40

Maxxam Group, Inc., Hurwitz (Charles E.), Maxxam
Properties, Inc., MCO Properties, Inc., MCO
Holdings, Inc., Pacific Lumber
Holdings, Inc., Federated
Development Company
v.
Fries (William, II), Lippitt (John), Buffington (Hon. Johne E.)

NO. 85-2802

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

SEP 10, 1987

Appeal From: N.D.Cal.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McO v. II), 829 F.2d 40, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12392 (9th Cir. 1987).

829 F.2d 40 (McO v. II)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.