McNutt v. State

783 So. 2d 1112, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2903, 2001 WL 228033
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 2001·No. No. 2D00-4261·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Johnny McNutt appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order denying McNutt relief because this court receded from Thornton v. State, 683 So.2d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), the opinion relied upon by McNutt to establish his right to relief. Wendt v. State, 711 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

However, the trial court’s order also ruled on an issue that was not posed by McNutt. Therefore, this affirmance is without prejudice to any right McNutt might have to file a timely, facially sufficient motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to rule 3.800(a), seeking relief pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000).

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNutt v. State, 783 So. 2d 1112, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2903, 2001 WL 228033 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

783 So. 2d 1112 (McNutt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thornton v. State
683 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Wendt v. State
711 So. 2d 1166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)