McNulty v. Zaganos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McNulty v. Zaganos

255 A.D. 274, 7 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4713

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 4, 1938·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Peb Curiam.

Although the original answers were superseded by amended answers, they constituted evidence of ownership by the defendant Zaganos of the automobile involved in the accident. (Weil v. Weil, 227 App. Div. 378; Vermeule v. City of Corning, 186 id. 206; affd., 230 N. Y. 585.)

The judgments in so far as appealed from by the plaintiffs should be reversed, the actions severed and a new trial granted to said plaintiffs as against the defendant John Zaganos, with costs to said plaintiffs-appellants to abide the event.

Townley, Glennon, Untebmyeb and Dobe, JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peb Curiam.

Although the original answers were superseded by amended answers, they constituted evidence of ownership by the defendant Zaganos of the automobile involved in the accident. (Weil v. Weil, 227 App. Div. 378; Vermeule v. City of Corning, 186 id. 206; affd., 230 N. Y. 585.)

The judgments in so far as appealed from by the plaintiffs should be reversed, the actions severed and a new trial granted to said plaintiffs as against the defendant John Zaganos, with costs to said plaintiffs-appellants to abide the event.

Townley, Glennon, Untebmyeb and Dobe, JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes for affirmance.

McNulty v. Zaganos, 255 A.D. 274, 7 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 274 (McNulty v. Zaganos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related