McNulty v. McNulty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McNulty v. McNulty

119 A.D. 150, 104 N.Y.S. 251, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3895

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 1907·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Plaintiff is the wife of defendant and brings this action for a separation on the grounds of cruelty. Her testimony shows that on several occasions the defendant kicked and beat her and frequently falsely accused her of adultery and. other misconduct. While denying most of these accusations the defendant partially admits some of them.

We are of the opinion that the plaintiff established good ground for a decree of separation and that her complaint should not have been dismissed. From the evidence now before us it is manifest that the conduct and attitude of defendant toward the plaintiff is such that she ought not to be compelled to live with him.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present — Patterson, P. J., McLaughlin, Houghton, Scott and Lambert, JJ. ' '

. Jndgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

Plaintiff is the wife of defendant and brings this action for a separation on the grounds of cruelty. Her testimony shows that on several occasions the defendant kicked and beat her and frequently falsely accused her of adultery and. other misconduct. While denying most of these accusations the defendant partially admits some of them.

We are of the opinion that the plaintiff established good ground for a decree of separation and that her complaint should not have been dismissed. From the evidence now before us it is manifest that the conduct and attitude of defendant toward the plaintiff is such that she ought not to be compelled to live with him.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present — Patterson, P. J., McLaughlin, Houghton, Scott and Lambert, JJ. ' '

. Jndgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

McNulty v. McNulty, 119 A.D. 150, 104 N.Y.S. 251, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

119 A.D. 150 (McNulty v. McNulty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related