McNulty v. Hoyt

New York Supreme Court

McNulty v. Hoyt

12 N.Y. St. Rep. 880

DecidedDecember 13, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 12 N.Y. St. Rep. 880 (McNulty v. Hoyt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNulty v. Hoyt, 12 N.Y. St. Rep. 880 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Dykman, J.

This action was brought to compel the specific performance of a written contract for the sale and conveyance of real property.

A trial has been had at the special term, and a judgment rendered for the plaintiff, from which the defendants have appealed.

The case involved questions of fact only, and. all the facts were found in the plaintiff’s favor' by the trial judge upon unmistakable testimony.

A plain case was made against the defendants on the facts, and there are no questions of law involved.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.

This action was brought to compel the specific performance of a written contract for the sale and conveyance of real property.

A trial has been had at the special term, and a judgment rendered for the plaintiff, from which the defendants have appealed.

The case involved questions of fact only, and. all the facts were found in the plaintiff’s favor' by the trial judge upon unmistakable testimony.

A plain case was made against the defendants on the facts, and there are no questions of law involved.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 N.Y. St. Rep. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnulty-v-hoyt-nysupct-1887.