McNulty v. Fischer

49 A.D.3d 946, 853 N.Y.2d 397
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 6, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.3d 946 (McNulty v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNulty v. Fischer, 49 A.D.3d 946, 853 N.Y.2d 397 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, the determination in issue is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and hearing testimony from the nurse involved in the incident (see Matter of Bonez v McGinnis, 305 AD2d 814, 815 [2003]). To the extent that the record contains conflicting evidence, credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Roman v Selsky, 42 [947]*947AD3d 721, 721 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 815 [2007]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that the misbehavior report was not issued in a timely manner, have been considered and found to be unavailing.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzalez v. Prack
62 A.D.3d 1220 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 946, 853 N.Y.2d 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnulty-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2008.