McNulty v. Everett

17 Iowa 581
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 15, 1864·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The facts and the conclusion of the court were stated by —

Wright, Oh. J.

Where a judgment by default was taken against two defendants, on the second day of the term, and on the next day, [582] one of them filed his affidavit of merits, and excusing his default upon the ground that he was the surety of his co-defendant, and had depended upon him to employ counsel and prepare the defense, according to his promise; and when on the day after this, the principal filed a like affidavit, and excused his default, upon the ground that he had been informed, by what he deemed a reliable source, that the “ term would be devoted solely to criminal business, that an appearance would not be necessary, as no defaults would be taken, and, that to the best of his knowledge, this was the general impression abroad in the community,” Held, that the court did not err in setting aside the default, upon condition that said defendant should plead instanter, or at least that there was no such abuse of the discretion properly and wisely lodged with the court below as to justify our interference.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNulty v. Everett, 17 Iowa 581 (iowa 1864).

17 Iowa 581 (McNulty v. Everett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newlove v. Stern
196 Iowa 1111 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1923)
Capital Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Swan
69 N.W. 1065 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Ellis v. Butler
43 N.W. 459 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1889)