Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/McNulty v. Dennard

McNulty v. Dennard

80 S.E. 34, 14 Ga. App. 13, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 383
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 25, 1913
Docket5147
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 S.E. 34 (McNulty v. Dennard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNulty v. Dennard, 80 S.E. 34, 14 Ga. App. 13, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 383 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

1. The magistrate did not err in refusing to dismiss the possessory warrant, nor in excluding testimony, nor in rendering a judgment in favor of the plaintiff; and the judge of the superior court properly refused to sanction the petition for certiorari.

2. The possession of whisky or other intoxicating liquor, not obtained in violation of the prohibition law, may be regained by possessory warrant, under such circumstances as would render that form of action available for the recovery of other personal property. Judgment affirmed.

L. C. Hoyl, H. A. Wilkinson, for plaintiff in error. John B. Irwin, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Windham v. Harmon
178 S.E. 160 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 S.E. 34, 14 Ga. App. 13, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnulty-v-dennard-gactapp-1913.