McNulty v. City of Cambridge

130 Mass. 275, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 71
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 17, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 130 Mass. 275 (McNulty v. City of Cambridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNulty v. City of Cambridge, 130 Mass. 275, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 71 (Mass. 1881).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

This case is covered in every particular by previous decisions. There was no evidence that either of the statements made by Tiehan and Carrigan in conversation with the police officers purported or was understood to be a notice to th.e city under the statute. Kenady v. Lawrence, 128 Mass. 318. The written notice was insufficient, because it did not state the cause of the injury. Noonan v. Lawrence, ante, 161. The notice given more than thirty days after the injury was too late, there being no evidence that the plaintiff was incapable of giving the notice within the thirty days. Mitchell v. Worcester, 129 Mass. 525.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grueby v. Chase Harris Forbes Corp.
197 N.E. 624 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Goodwin v. City of Fall River
117 N.E. 796 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)
Saunders v. City of Boston
46 N.E. 98 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
May v. City of Boston
23 N.E. 220 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Lyons v. City of Cambridge
132 Mass. 534 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 Mass. 275, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnulty-v-city-of-cambridge-mass-1881.