McNulty v. City of Cambridge

130 Mass. 275, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 71
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 17, 1881·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

This case is covered in every particular by previous decisions. There was no evidence that either of the statements made by Tiehan and Carrigan in conversation with the police officers purported or was understood to be a notice to th.e city under the statute. Kenady v. Lawrence, 128 Mass. 318. The written notice was insufficient, because it did not state the cause of the injury. Noonan v. Lawrence, ante, 161. The notice given more than thirty days after the injury was too late, there being no evidence that the plaintiff was incapable of giving the notice within the thirty days. Mitchell v. Worcester, 129 Mass. 525.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNulty v. City of Cambridge, 130 Mass. 275, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 71 (Mass. 1881).

130 Mass. 275 (McNulty v. City of Cambridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grueby v. Chase Harris Forbes Corp.
197 N.E. 624 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Goodwin v. City of Fall River
117 N.E. 796 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)
Saunders v. City of Boston
46 N.E. 98 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
May v. City of Boston
23 N.E. 220 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Lyons v. City of Cambridge
132 Mass. 534 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)