McNulty v. Batty

Supreme Court

McNulty v. Batty

51 U.S. 646

DecidedDecember 15, 1850

StatusPublished

This text of 51 U.S. 646 (McNulty v. Batty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNulty v. Batty, 51 U.S. 646 (1850).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Walker,

of counsel for the defendants in error, moved the court to direct the clerk to what court the mandate, or other process prescribed by the forty-third rule of court, should be addressed. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered-by the court, that the clerk do not issue any mandate or other process in this case, but only a certified copy of the judgment this day rendered in this cause;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Walker,

of counsel for the defendants in error, moved the court to direct the clerk to what court the mandate, or other process prescribed by the forty-third rule of court, should be addressed. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered-by the court, that the clerk do not issue any mandate or other process in this case, but only a certified copy of the judgment this day rendered in this cause;

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 U.S. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnulty-v-batty-scotus-1850.