McNulty v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

199 So. 2d 706, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3923
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 1967
DocketNo. 36021
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 199 So. 2d 706 (McNulty v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNulty v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 199 So. 2d 706, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3923 (Fla. 1967).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court so we issued the writ. After hearing argument and further consideration of the briefs and record we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. There[707]*707fore the writ heretofore issued is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Welfare
350 So. 2d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Eckersen v. Florida East Coast Railroad
247 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 2d 706, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnulty-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-fla-1967.