McNulty v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of Florida

McNulty v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

199 So. 2d 706, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3923

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 7, 1967·No. No. 36021·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court so we issued the writ. After hearing argument and further consideration of the briefs and record we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. There[707]*707fore the writ heretofore issued is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court so we issued the writ. After hearing argument and further consideration of the briefs and record we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. There[707]*707fore the writ heretofore issued is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

McNulty v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 199 So. 2d 706, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3923 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

199 So. 2d 706 (McNulty v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related