McNitt v. State

24 A.D.2d 544, 261 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3794
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 25, 1965·No. Claim No. 41585·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts, by reducing the amount to $3,575, and interest, and as so modified judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent. Memorandum: The Court of Claims Judge awarded $2,000 for consequential damage, and $3,500 for direct damage. The amount awarded for consequential damage was within the range of the testimony of the experts and should be affirmed. However, as to the award of $3,500 for direct damage, this was $1,925 higher than the testimony most favorable to claimant. In other words, there is no basis in the record for an award in that amount. Nor can a view of the property act as a substitute for testimony. (Matter of City of New York [A. & W. Realty Corp.], 1 N Y 2d 428, 433; George’s Bake Shop v. State of New York, 21 A D 2d 423, 424, 425.) This part of the award should be reduced to $1,575, making the total amount $3,575, and interest. (Appeal from judgment of Court of 'Claims for claimant in an action for damages for permanent appropriation of realty.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNitt v. State, 24 A.D.2d 544, 261 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

24 A.D.2d 544 (McNitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zeitlin v. State
60 A.D.2d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
In re the Rochester Urban Renewal Agency
55 A.D.2d 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Kravec v. State
51 A.D.2d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)