McNiff v. Lighthouse Construction, LLC

• Court: Superior Court of Maine
• Decided: April 17, 2018
• Docket: YORcv-17-0278
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT YORK, ss. Civil Action Docket No. CV-17-0278

BRITT McNIFF and SHAWN McNIFF

Plaintiffs,

V. ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS LIGHTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION, LLC and PETER ANDERSEN

Defendants.

Plaintiffs Britt and Shawn McNiff filed this action against Lighthouse

Construction, LLC and Peter Andersen seeking compensatory and punitive damages

arising out of allegedly defective work performed in renovating their property in Cape

Neddick. The complaint alleges breach of contract (count I), unjust enrichment (count

II), negligence (count III), violation of the Maine Home Construction Contracts Act (count

IV), and violation of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (count V).

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss and an answer/counterclaim. The motion

seeks dismissal of Peter Andersen in his individual capacity because the complaint "sets

forth no claims or assertions that would justify any claim of liability on the part of the

individual Defendant, Peter Andersen." 2/15/2018 Motion to Dismiss, at 1-2. The

counterclaims for malicious prosecution' and abuse of process are the subject of

plaintiffs' subsequently-filed motion to dismiss.

Defendants' motion to dismiss Peter Andersen will be granted. Even viewed in

the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the facts set forth in the complaint do not establish

1 Because thls is a civil case, the court considers this claim to be one of wrongful use of civil proceedings. See Pepperell Trust Co. v. Mountain Heir Fin. Corp., 1998 ME 46, ,r 16, 708 A.2d 651.

1 a basis for liabiliiy of Peter Andersen individually. The dismissal is without prejudice.

Should discovery elicit a factual basis for individual liability of Peter Andersen, plaintiffs

may file a motion to amend under M.R. Civ. P. 15.

Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the malicious prosecution (wrongful use of civil

proceedings) and the abuse of process counterclaims is also granted. See Pepperell Trust

Co. v. Mountain Heir Fin. Corp., 1998 ME 46, 11 16, 708 A.2d 651; Potter, Prescott,

Jamieson & Nelson. P.A. v. Campbell, 1998 ME 70, 117,708 A.2d 283.

Accordingly, the entry shall be: "Defendants' motion to dismiss as to Peter

Andersen is granted without prejudice. Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss counterclaims for

malicious prosecution (wrongful use of civil proceedings) and abuse of process is granted

without prejudice."

SO ORDERED

The clerk may incorporate this order by reference on the docket pursuant to Rule

79(a).

Dated: April 17, 2018

2 ALFSC-CV-2017-278 BRITI McNIFF, ET AL V. LIGHTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION, LLC, ET AL

PLAINTIFFS: BRITI AND SEAN MCNIFF REPRESENTED BY GREGORY ORSO, ESQ. ORSO LAW PA 188 YORK ST YORK, ME 03909

DEFENDANTS: LIGHTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION, LLC AND PETER ANDERSEN REPRESENTED BY: BRADLEY LOWN, ESQ. COUGHLIN, RAINBOTH, MURPHY & LOWN 439 MIDDLE ST PORTSMOUTH, NH 03801