McNiff v. Lighthouse Construction, LLC
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT YORK, ss. Civil Action Docket No. CV-17-0278
BRITT McNIFF and SHAWN McNIFF Plaintiffs,
V. ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS
LIGHTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION, LLC and PETER ANDERSEN
Defendants.
Plaintiffs Britt and Shawn McNiff filed this action against Lighthouse Construction, LLC and Peter Andersen seeking compensatory and punitive damages arising out of allegedly defective work performed in renovating their property in Cape Neddick. The complaint alleges breach of contract (count I), unjust enrichment (count II), negligence (count III), violation of the Maine Home Construction Contracts Act (count IV), and violation of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (count V).
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss and an answer/counterclaim. The motion seeks dismissal of Peter Andersen in his individual capacity because the complaint "sets forth no claims or assertions that would justify any claim of liability on the part of the individual Defendant, Peter Andersen." 2/15/2018 Motion to Dismiss, at 1-2. The counterclaims for malicious prosecution' and abuse of process are the subject of plaintiffs' subsequently-filed motion to dismiss.
Defendants' motion to dismiss Peter Andersen will be granted. Even viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the facts set forth in the complaint do not establish
1 Because thls is a civil case, the court considers this claim to be one of wrongful use of civil proceedings. See Pepperell Trust Co. v. Mountain Heir Fin. Corp., 1998 ME 46, ,r 16, 708 A.2d 651.
a basis for liabiliiy of Peter Andersen individually. The dismissal is without prejudice. Should discovery elicit a factual basis for individual liability of Peter Andersen, plaintiffs may file a motion to amend under M.R. Civ. P. 15.
Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the malicious prosecution (wrongful use of civil proceedings) and the abuse of process counterclaims is also granted. See Pepperell Trust Co. v. Mountain Heir Fin. Corp., 1998 ME 46, 11 16, 708 A.2d 651; Potter, Prescott, Jamieson & Nelson. P.A. v. Campbell, 1998 ME 70, 117,708 A.2d 283.
Accordingly, the entry shall be: "Defendants' motion to dismiss as to Peter Andersen is granted without prejudice. Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss counterclaims for malicious prosecution (wrongful use of civil proceedings) and abuse of process is granted without prejudice." SO ORDERED The clerk may incorporate this order by reference on the docket pursuant to Rule 79(a). Dated: April 17, 2018
ALFSC-CV-2017-278 BRITI McNIFF, ET AL V. LIGHTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION, LLC, ET AL
PLAINTIFFS: BRITI AND SEAN MCNIFF REPRESENTED BY GREGORY ORSO, ESQ. ORSO LAW PA 188 YORK ST YORK, ME 03909
DEFENDANTS: LIGHTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION, LLC AND PETER ANDERSEN REPRESENTED BY: BRADLEY LOWN, ESQ. COUGHLIN, RAINBOTH, MURPHY & LOWN 439 MIDDLE ST PORTSMOUTH, NH 03801
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McNiff v. Lighthouse Construction, LLC (McNiff v. Lighthouse Construction, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.