McNiel v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

McNiel v. State

181 So. 888, 132 Fla. 655, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1803

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 8, 1938·Published

Opinion

*656 Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error being convicted of murder in the second degree under an indictment charging murder in the first degree, brings up the record for review on writ of error.

The only question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict and judgment.

On a careful consideration of the record, we find the evi- ' dence was ample and that no reversible error is made to appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*656 Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error being convicted of murder in the second degree under an indictment charging murder in the first degree, brings up the record for review on writ of error.

The only question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict and judgment.

On a careful consideration of the record, we find the evi- ' dence was ample and that no reversible error is made to appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

McNiel v. State, 181 So. 888, 132 Fla. 655, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1803 (Fla. 1938).

Pincite

181 So. 888 (McNiel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.