McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Associates Inc.
This text of 474 F. App'x 999 (McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Associates Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anthony McNeish appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint after it was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Assocs., No. 5:1 1-cv-00739-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneish-v-big-sarge-bail-bonds-associates-inc-ca4-2012.