McNeill v. Stamper

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 27, 2009
• Docket: 09-6264
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6264

MICHAEL MCNEILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FRANK STAMPER,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

SERGEANT KINNEY; ATLANTIC DIAGNOSTIC OF DURHAM; NC DOC DIRECTOR,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00162-GCM)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Kelly Elizabeth Street, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. McNeill v. Stamper, No. 3:08-cv-00162-GCM (W.D.N.C. Feb.

3, 2009). We deny McNeill’s motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED