McNeill v. McNeill

Supreme Court of South Carolina

McNeill v. McNeill

343 S.E.2d 626, 288 S.C. 491, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 353

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMay 19, 1986

Docket22552

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 343 S.E.2d 626 (McNeill v. McNeill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNeill v. McNeill, 343 S.E.2d 626, 288 S.C. 491, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 353 (S.C. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from a final order of the Family Court which found the prior separation agreement inequitable, unfair, and refused to enforce it, granted the parties a divorce, made an equitable division of the property, and awarded alimony. We affirm as modified.

A divorce action being a matter in equity heard by the trial judge alone, this Court’s scope of review extends to the finding of facts based on its own view of the preponderance of the evidence. Mitchell v. Mitchell, 283 S. C. 87, *492 320 S. E. (2d) 706 (1984); Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville, 266 S. C. 81, 221 S. E. (2d) 773 (1976).

After thoroughly reviewing the record, we conclude that the appropriate amount of alimony is one hundred fifty ($150.00) dollars per month. We modify the Family Court order by reducing the alimony from two hundred fifty ($250.00) dollars per month to one hundred fifty ($150.00) dollars per month.

The remaining exceptions are without merit and the order of the trial court is affirmed as modified pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 23.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI