McNeill v. Jordan

Fourth Circuit

McNeill v. Jordan

294 F. App'x 1

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2008·No. No. 08-7080·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v. Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03040-FL (E.D.N.C. June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v. Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03040-FL (E.D.N.C. June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

McNeill v. Jordan, 294 F. App'x 1 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

294 F. App'x 1 (McNeill v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related