McNeill v. Germany
This text of McNeill v. Germany (McNeill v. Germany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7343
MICHAEL MCNEILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER 1ST MR. GERMANY; UNIT MANAGER MR. WALL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00498-GCM)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order
denying as moot his motion for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
McNeill v. Germany, No. 3:08-cv-00498-GCM (W.D.N.C. July 14,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McNeill v. Germany, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneill-v-germany-ca4-2009.