McNeill v. Germany

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 2009
Docket09-7343
StatusUnpublished

This text of McNeill v. Germany (McNeill v. Germany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNeill v. Germany, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7343

MICHAEL MCNEILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER 1ST MR. GERMANY; UNIT MANAGER MR. WALL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00498-GCM)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order

denying as moot his motion for summary judgment. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

McNeill v. Germany, No. 3:08-cv-00498-GCM (W.D.N.C. July 14,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McNeill v. Germany, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneill-v-germany-ca4-2009.