McNeill v. City Council

365 P.2d 687, 148 Colo. 277, 1961 Colo. LEXIS 407
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided October 23, 1961·No. No. 19,882·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moore.

[278]*278McNeill, the plaintiff in error, applied to the city council of the city of Cortez for the issuance of a license to sell a fermented malt beverage, (3.2) beer.

It is disclosed by the record before us that only one such outlet has been authorized in the entire county of Montezuma, and that it is located at a distance of twenty-five miles from the city of Cortez. The application for the license was denied by the city council and in the district court the action of the council was upheld.

The pertinent facts in all respects are the same as those present in the case of The KBT Corporation v. Walker, 148 Colo. 274, 365 P. (2d) 685. All that is said in the opinion in that case is fully applicable here.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to order issuance of the license.

Mr. Chief Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Frantz concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNeill v. City Council, 365 P.2d 687, 148 Colo. 277, 1961 Colo. LEXIS 407 (Colo. 1961).

365 P.2d 687 (McNeill v. City Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hirsch v. Board of Trustees
370 P.2d 760 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1962)