McNeil v. Wyeth

462 F.3d 364
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McNeil v. Wyeth. Read the opinion of the Court — 462 F.3d 364
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2007·No. 05-10509·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 13, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk m 05-10509 _______________

SUE C. MCNEIL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WYETH, Formerly Known as American Home Products Corporation, Doing Business as A.H. Robins Company, Inc.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas _________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the “Motion for Modification of Certain

Statements in the Court’s Opinion” and the “Petition for Panel

Rehearing for the Limited Purpose of Modifying Certain Statements

in the Opinion” are DENIED.

/s/ Jerry E. Smith JERRY E. SMITH United States Circuit Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNeil v. Wyeth, 462 F.3d 364 (5th Cir. 2007).

462 F.3d 364 (McNeil v. Wyeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ackermann v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
526 F.3d 203 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Pustejovsky v. Pliva, Inc.
623 F.3d 271 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)
Good v. Altria Group, Inc.
501 F.3d 29 (First Circuit, 2007)