McNeil v. United States

64 Ct. Cl. 406, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 560, 1928 WL 2967
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedJanuary 9, 1928
DocketNo. F-294
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 64 Ct. Cl. 406 (McNeil v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNeil v. United States, 64 Ct. Cl. 406, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 560, 1928 WL 2967 (cc 1928).

Opinion

[407]*407MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

This case is on all fours with the case of Strong v. United States, 60 C. Cls. 627. The statutes governing the Strong ease are the same as those which govern this case. There is no difference between the two cases. The pay and allowances of the plaintiff have been fixed by law. The officers of the Treasury have no authority to pay the officer until an appropriation therefor has been made. But the liability of the United States to pay exists independently of the appropriation, and may be enforced by proceedings in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lovett v. United States
66 F. Supp. 142 (Court of Claims, 1945)
Conrad v. United States
74 Ct. Cl. 289 (Court of Claims, 1932)
Palmer v. United States
69 Ct. Cl. 260 (Court of Claims, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Ct. Cl. 406, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 560, 1928 WL 2967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneil-v-united-states-cc-1928.