McNeil v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McNeil v. State

120 P. 1128, 7 Okla. Crim. 702

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 3, 1912·No. No. A-1334.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted on the 1st day of May, 1911, in the county court of Canadian .county, on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor from one place to another in this state, and on the 29th day of said month was sentenced to pay a fine of four hundred dollars and be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of ninety days. After a careful examination of the record in this ease we think the judgment should be affirmed under the doctrine announced in the case of Clarence Maynes v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 487, 119 Pac. 644. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted on the 1st day of May, 1911, in the county court of Canadian .county, on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor from one place to another in this state, and on the 29th day of said month was sentenced to pay a fine of four hundred dollars and be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of ninety days. After a careful examination of the record in this ease we think the judgment should be affirmed under the doctrine announced in the case of Clarence Maynes v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 487, 119 Pac. 644. It is so ordered.

McNeil v. State, 120 P. 1128, 7 Okla. Crim. 702 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

120 P. 1128 (McNeil v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related