McNeil v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McNeil v. State

17 A.D.3d 998, 793 N.Y.S.2d 793

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 2005

DocketClaim No. 107231; Appeal No. 4

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.3d 998 (McNeil v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNeil v. State, 17 A.D.3d 998, 793 N.Y.S.2d 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Richard E. Sise, J.), entered May 4, 2004. The interlocutory judgment ordered that a trial on the issue of damages be scheduled.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Bradford v State of New York (17 AD3d 995 [2005]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Richard E. Sise, J.), entered May 4, 2004. The interlocutory judgment ordered that a trial on the issue of damages be scheduled.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Bradford v State of New York (17 AD3d 995 [2005]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.3d 998, 793 N.Y.S.2d 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneil-v-state-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack