McNeil v. State
163 So. 3d 661, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6000, 2015 WL 1851619
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2015·No. No. 5D13-1810·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION
Following the issuance of our opinion in this case, Appellant, Brenton McNeil, moved for certification of a question of [662]*662great public importance. We grant the motion and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v) as one of great public importance:
ARE THE COSTS IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 938.085, 938.08, AND 938.10, FLORIDA STATUTES (2006), ASSESSED “PER CASE” OR “PER COUNT”?
QUESTION CERTIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McNeil v. State, 163 So. 3d 661, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6000, 2015 WL 1851619 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
163 So. 3d 661 (McNeil v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brenton McNeil v. State of Florida
215 So. 3d 55 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
Dixon v. State
182 So. 3d 670 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)