McNeil v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McNeil v. State

208 So. 2d 628, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5792

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 1968·No. No. 67-307·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant below from a conviction and sentence for the crime of second degree murder. No reversible error has been made to appear, and we affirm. The court’s charge to the jury relating to self defense was sufficient. Disney v. State, 72 Fla. 492, 73 So. 598, 601-602. On the record the trial court was justified in concluding that the jurors had not violated his admonition given pursuant to § 918.06 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for a mistrial with reference thereto was not an abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant below from a conviction and sentence for the crime of second degree murder. No reversible error has been made to appear, and we affirm. The court’s charge to the jury relating to self defense was sufficient. Disney v. State, 72 Fla. 492, 73 So. 598, 601-602. On the record the trial court was justified in concluding that the jurors had not violated his admonition given pursuant to § 918.06 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for a mistrial with reference thereto was not an abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

McNeil v. State, 208 So. 2d 628, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5792 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

208 So. 2d 628 (McNeil v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related