McNeil v. State, Division of Risk Management

993 So. 2d 177, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 16970, 2008 WL 4755353
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2008·No. No. 1D08-4671·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat Claimant’s petition for writ of prohibition as a petition for writ of certio-rari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition for extraordinary relief on the merits.

BROWNING, C.J., BARFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNeil v. State, Division of Risk Management, 993 So. 2d 177, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 16970, 2008 WL 4755353 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

993 So. 2d 177 (McNeil v. State, Division of Risk Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watts v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'N
993 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)